See how DXP, headless CMS, traditional CMS, and open-source platforms compare across capability, cost efficiency, implementation complexity, and operational burden.
Click any platform on the graph to view its complete scorecard.
Four dimensions. One view. Faster decisions.
Higher capability scores mean a platform can do more across key requirements. Look for platforms aligned to your must-have capabilities.
Higher placement means more capability delivered per unit of cost-to-own. Balance power with practicality.
Larger bubbles indicate more complex builds and heavier implementation effort. Factor in your timeline and team expertise.
Color shows the day-to-day operational burden.
An independent evaluation framework designed for enterprises, by implementers.
Platforms are evaluated using the same published framework, with no vendor influence on scoring.
Scores account for implementation effort and operational burden, not just feature lists.
Scoring categories, definitions, and weighting are publicly documented.
Use criteria-level scoring alongside broader analyst research to understand what each approach is designed to answer.
Comparing this against analyst research? See how the 2026 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Digital Experience Platforms differs from criteria-level scoring, and which questions each approach is built to answer.
Explore the full methodology →Each platform category has its own analytical lens. Explore dedicated deep-dives with five analytical views built around what matters most for that segment.
All scores are independent and unsponsored — based on implementation evidence, not vendor briefings.
